Decision 29495
Full Text of Decision 29495
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
decision maintained |
|
Summary:
The Board allows the claimant's appeal on the basis of an error as to the effective date of the disqualification. According to the Umpire, the claimant did not suffer any prejudice as a result of the clerical error.
Decision A0021.95
Full Text of Decision A0021.95
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
decision maintained |
|
Summary:
In light of the claimant's statement, we are convinced that the claimant suffered no prejudice from the fact that the notice sent by the Commission referred to section 31 of the Regulation rather than section 30.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
penalties |
knowingly |
|
|
Decision 26229
Full Text of Decision 26229
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
decision maintained |
|
Summary:
Refer to: A-0021.95
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
penalties |
knowingly |
|
|
Decision 20207
Full Text of Decision 20207
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
decision maintained |
|
Summary:
Refer to: A-0853.91
Decision A-0853.91
Full Text of Decision A-0853.91
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
decision maintained |
|
Summary:
We all agree that the claimant was not prejudiced by reason of the fact that the CEIC's notice referred to para. 43(1)(a) instead of 43(1)(b). It is clear that he was fully aware of the grounds invoked to justify the denial of benefit. The Umpire did not err by upholding the Board's decision.
Decision 22205
Full Text of Decision 22205
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
decision maintained |
|
Summary:
James Bay worker on three-weeks unpaid leave because of long work hours; informed afterwards that he is laid off. Point in dispute: three-week antidating. Antidating granted by the judge; however it is deemed that he is not unemployed; para. 10(4) and Reg. 37(3).
Decision 20606
Full Text of Decision 20606
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
decision maintained |
|
Summary:
Reference to ss. 44(1) replaced by 42(4) after claimant's appeal. HAMILTON and VON FINDENIGG referred to. I think it is illogical to hold against the CEIC what is a rather minor error, as it had no obligation to do so. Claimant had fully understood the content of the notice.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
second notice found valid |
|
Decision 19006
Full Text of Decision 19006
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
decision maintained |
|
Summary:
Not unemployed as from 24-10-89 according to the notice; upheld by the Board. A typing error: it was 24-10-88. VON FINDENIGG and CUB-14631 relied on by the insured person. They concerned a second notice issued by CEIC, whereas in this case we are dealing with a typing error.
Decision 16233
Full Text of Decision 16233
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
decision maintained |
|
Summary:
Refer to: A-0128.89
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
umpires |
grounds of appeal |
capricious finding |
req'd |
Decision A-0128.89
Full Text of Decision A-0128.89
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
decision maintained |
|
Summary:
Disentitled from 7-4 to 28-9 by reason of his farming activities under ss. 43(3) dealing with off-season from 1-10 to 31-3. Held by Umpire that claimant was well aware of the ground for disentitlement; no prejudice. Upheld by FC without comment.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
umpires |
grounds of appeal |
capricious finding |
req'd |
Decision 17691
Full Text of Decision 17691
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
decision maintained |
|
Summary:
The notice speaks of wages where as it is in fact vacation pay. The insured person sites HAMILTON. It is clear that the effect of Regs 57 and 58 are the same, whether the issue is one of wages or vacation. As the SC stated, this would have form prevail over substance.
Decision 16470
Full Text of Decision 16470
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
decision maintained |
|
Summary:
Commission relied on reg. 58(3) to prorate earnings and submits this was incorrectly done and reg. 58(4) is to be used. Same situation as in CUB 12601. The contract provided for wages to be paid to claimant without performing continuous services. The allocation was correct.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
earnings |
allocation |
services provided irregularly |
|
Decision A-0504.88
Full Text of Decision A-0504.88
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
decision maintained |
|
Summary:
Alleges that the question to decide was not whether she had been available but whether the reason given in support of non-availability was justified. As per Umpire, issue not limited to this reason. She had to prove the larger issue of availability. Upheld by FC.
Decision 14914
Full Text of Decision 14914
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
decision maintained |
|
Summary:
Refer to: A-0504.88
Decision 12601
Full Text of Decision 12601
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
decision maintained |
|
Summary:
University teacher who did not teach during the last 3 weeks of his contract ending 30-4. Held by Board that salary was to be allocated under reg. 58(3) to 30-4. The Board reached the right decision but not for the good reasons. Reg. 58(4) applies.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
earnings |
allocation |
without services |
|
Decision 11882
Full Text of Decision 11882
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
decision maintained |
|
Summary:
The Board found that there was misconduct. It would be harsh to suggest there was misconduct. Rather there was a complete misunderstanding with employer and she left without just cause. I am not disturbing the finding of the Board and the one-week disqualification.
Decision 11564
Full Text of Decision 11564
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
decision maintained |
|
Summary:
Disentitled as not available during an additional 6-week leave of absence requested of employer following childbirth. This is the wrong issue. Held to be not unemployed. If I am in error, she should be disqualified 6 weeks for quitting. Proper result reached in the end for the wrong reasons.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
availability for work |
incompatible situations |
leave requested |
|
voluntarily leaving employment |
applicability |
maternity leave |
|