Decision A-0853.91
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision A-0853.91 | Ernst Dominique | Federal | French | 1993-02-02 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed Unanimous | No | N/A | 20207 |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| board of referees | issue not recognized | decision maintained |
Summary:
We all agree that the claimant was not prejudiced by reason of the fact that the CEIC's notice referred to para. 43(1)(a) instead of 43(1)(b). It is clear that he was fully aware of the grounds invoked to justify the denial of benefit. The Umpire did not err by upholding the Board's decision.