Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
decision maintained |
|
Summary:
Disentitled from 7-4 to 28-9 by reason of his farming activities under ss. 43(3) dealing with off-season from 1-10 to 31-3. Held by Umpire that claimant was well aware of the ground for disentitlement; no prejudice. Upheld by FC without comment.
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
umpires |
grounds of appeal |
capricious finding |
req'd |
Summary:
On credibility issues and assessment of facts, an Umpire should not substitute the Board's finding for his own unless it is based on an erroneous finding of fact made in a perverse or capricious manner or without regard for the material before it. No comments from FC.