Decision 20310
Full Text of Decision 20310
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
errors by Commission |
not binding for future |
|
Summary:
The fact that other persons in his situation may have received UI in the past does not mean that the provisions of the Act should not be made to apply to him. As I stated in CUB 11227, disparities in enforcement processes can never justify departures from the rule of law.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
courses |
pattern study-work for brief period |
|
Decision 19102
Full Text of Decision 19102
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
errors by Commission |
not binding for future |
|
Summary:
In spite of his experience over the previous 14 years, which appears quite fortunate to say the least, no rights have been acquired. Not having been subjected to the tests imposed by the statute does not lead to a finding that such tests should no longer be required of him.
Decision 13814A
Full Text of Decision 13814A
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
errors by Commission |
not binding for future |
|
Summary:
The real reason for his appeal is that while previously attending the same course he received UI and can see no reason why he is treated differently. The simple answer is that he should not have received UI in the earlier years if the circumstances weresimilar to present ones.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
special reasons |
delay due to representative |
|
| courses of instruction or training |
referral |
discrimination |
|
Decision 16534
Full Text of Decision 16534
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
errors by Commission |
not binding for future |
|
Summary:
Claimant could see no reason why he was entitled to UI for the first course and disentitled for the second one. I agree with him but it is of no assistance to him because, in my view, he should have been disentitled for the first course.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
courses |
employment left |
|
Decision 14215
Full Text of Decision 14215
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
errors by Commission |
not binding for future |
|
Summary:
Claimant has collected UI during the summer before when not employed as supply teacher. There was then no attempt by the Commission to enforce the UI rules. Naturally she was upset in the summer 1986 when someone tried to impose such requirements on her. [p. 4]
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| refusal of work |
existence of refusal |
|
|
| teaching |
availability for work |
summer months |
|
| availability for work |
job search |
effective date |
|
Decision 14169
Full Text of Decision 14169
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
errors by Commission |
not binding for future |
|
Summary:
A pattern of conduct deemed at one time to comply with 14(a) is no binding precedent when the pattern is repeated subsequently and found to be wanting of these same requirements. It was open to the Board to make different findings of fact.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
absences from home |
on vacation |
|
Decision 13279
Full Text of Decision 13279
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
errors by Commission |
not binding for future |
|
Summary:
Context: availability. Administrative oversight cannot provide any justification in future for making exception to case law.
Decision 13116
Full Text of Decision 13116
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
errors by Commission |
not binding for future |
|
Summary:
Context: earnings as income. If the Commission was wrong in 1984 and misapplied the law in a manner more generous to the claimant, it is no grounds to perpetuate the error.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| earnings |
business returns |
as income |
|
| earnings |
allocation |
services provided irregularly |
|
Decision 12750
Full Text of Decision 12750
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
errors by Commission |
not binding for future |
|
Summary:
Teacher allowed benefit in summer in 1986 and prior to 1985 but not in 1985. Uneven treatment from one summer to next is not a relevant factor. Claimant's conduct may have been different or Commission more vigilent in 1985 than other years.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| teaching |
availability for work |
summer months |
|
Decision 12405
Full Text of Decision 12405
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
errors by Commission |
not binding for future |
|
Summary:
Disentitled one day per week; attending course part-time. I place no importance on fact that he may have received benefit 5 days out of 5 in past. Must not judge by comparing to past. Act governs despite these allegations.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
applicability |
unable to obtain suitable work |
|
Decision 11353
Full Text of Decision 11353
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
errors by Commission |
not binding for future |
|
Summary:
Claimant's irritation arises out of the fact that he had been granted benefits the previous year. The misapplication of the Act previously is not a legal ground which entitles an Umpire to upset a Board's decision.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
courses |
pattern study-work as requirement |
|
| availability for work |
courses |
interruption |
short period of time |
