| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
errors by Commission |
not binding for future |
|
Summary:
Teacher allowed benefit in summer in 1986 and prior to 1985 but not in 1985. Uneven treatment from one summer to next is not a relevant factor. Claimant's conduct may have been different or Commission more vigilent in 1985 than other years.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| teaching |
availability for work |
summer months |
|
Summary:
While claimants laid off and expecting recall may rely on recall as the most promising avenue for re-employment, she must be seeking work other than as teacher that she could reasonably expect in summer.
