| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
special reasons |
delay due to representative |
|
Summary:
Appeal well beyond time limits. Counsel explained there had been a misunderstanding in the telephone instructions he had received. Claimant understood instructions to be for an appeal but he did not interpret them that way. As soon as he realized his mistake, he filed an appeal.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
errors by Commission |
not binding for future |
|
Summary:
The real reason for his appeal is that while previously attending the same course he received UI and can see no reason why he is treated differently. The simple answer is that he should not have received UI in the earlier years if the circumstances weresimilar to present ones.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| courses of instruction or training |
referral |
discrimination |
|
Summary:
It is submitted that claimant's disentitlement amounts to discrimination under s.15 of Charter. I do not agree. He is being treated under the law in the same way as any other claimant who is attending a full-time course to which he has not been referred.
