Summary of Issue: Right Of Appeal


Decision A-0930.96 Full Text of Decision A-0930.96

summary
Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
board of referees appeal system right of appeal identify issue
Summary:

FCA ruled that when a notice of appeal is filed before the process defined in subsection 43(1) is completed, this notice is premature and nothing prevents the Commission from completing the process. The Commission may go so far as to complete the process by giving notice of the overpayment amount contained in its written submissions to the BOR. Consequently, in the case at bar, the appeal notice filed by the claimant was premature, as he had not yet been notified of the amount of the overpayment.

other summary
Other Issue(s): Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
reconsideration of claim overpayment calculation
reconsideration of claim authority to review claimant's request reconsideration of claim by Commission

Decision T-0472.88 Full Text of Decision T-0472.88

summary
Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
board of referees appeal system right of appeal identify issue
Summary:

Under ss. 43(1), the reconsideration of a situation which does not alter an earlier decision is not appealable under ss. 43(2). Only decisions that alter an earlier decision are appealable.

other summary
Other Issue(s): Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
reconsideration of claim authority to review change in jurisprudence
reconsideration of claim authority to review claimant's request reconsideration of claim by Commission

Decision 10722 Full Text of Decision 10722

summary
Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
board of referees appeal system right of appeal identify issue
Summary:

Claimant advised that he was not eligible for referral to course. He did not appeal the decision. Assuming without deciding that there might have been a right of appeal, the Commission is under no obligation at law to give legal advice as to this possibility. See MERCIER.

other summary
Other Issue(s): Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
reconsideration of claim errors by Commission not a ground of entitlement
board of referees appeal system right of appeal responsibility

Decision 24683 Full Text of Decision 24683

summary
Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
board of referees appeal system right of appeal responsibility
Summary:

The first reason (advanced as special reason under s. 82) is that the claimant was not advised by the Commission or the Board of his right to appeal to an Umpire. The simple reason for this is that there is no statutory obligation for them to do so.


Decision 10722 Full Text of Decision 10722

summary
Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
board of referees appeal system right of appeal responsibility
Summary:

Claimant advised that he was not eligible for referral to course. He did not appeal the decision. Assuming without deciding that there might have been a right of appeal, the Commission is under no obligation at law to give legal advice as to this possibility. See MERCIER.

other summary
Other Issue(s): Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
reconsideration of claim errors by Commission not a ground of entitlement
board of referees appeal system right of appeal identify issue

Decision T-2531.81

summary
Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
board of referees appeal system right of appeal who
Summary:

For an employee to have a right of appeal under s.79, he must be a claimant. He can be a claimant only if he has applied for benefit which means UI benefits. Decision by Commission regarding premium rate reduction allowed to employer cannot be appealed.


Decision A-0647.78 Full Text of Decision A-0647.78

summary
Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
board of referees appeal system right of appeal who
Summary:

Section 79 (now section 114) of the Act confers a right of appeal on "claimant" as defined aggrieved by a decision of the Commission on a claim or reconsideration under section 43 (now section 52) of the EIA. Paragraph 44(i) (now 54(k)) was not intented to authorize and Regulation 175 (now 56) do not provide for appeals against the Commission's refusal to write-off an overpayment.

other summary
Other Issue(s): Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
reconsideration of claim overpayment authority to write off recourse
Date modified: