| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
errors by Commission |
not a ground of entitlement |
|
Summary:
Claimant not having been referred, and admittedly not having been available during the course, he was not entitled to benefits. He was in no way misled into failing to claim benefits to which entitled as he never was entitled to them.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
appeal system |
right of appeal |
identify issue |
Summary:
Claimant advised that he was not eligible for referral to course. He did not appeal the decision. Assuming without deciding that there might have been a right of appeal, the Commission is under no obligation at law to give legal advice as to this possibility. See MERCIER.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
appeal system |
right of appeal |
responsibility |
Summary:
Claimant advised that he was not eligible for referral to course. He did not appeal the decision. Assuming without deciding that there might have been a right of appeal, the Commission is under no obligation at law to give legal advice as to this possibility. See MERCIER.
