Decision 24683
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 24683 | Haddad | English | 1994-06-29 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| board of referees | appeal system | right of appeal | responsibility |
Summary:
The first reason (advanced as special reason under s. 82) is that the claimant was not advised by the Commission or the Board of his right to appeal to an Umpire. The simple reason for this is that there is no statutory obligation for them to do so.