Decision 26065
Full Text of Decision 26065
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| claim procedure |
record of employment |
submitted late |
|
Summary:
Claim filed 4-89. Not enough weeks to qualify. Records of Employment submitted in 11-92 indicated he did have enough weeks. Reconsideration request considered as a late appeal. No special reasons warranting an extension of appeal period.
Decision 22857
Full Text of Decision 22857
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| claim procedure |
record of employment |
submitted late |
|
Summary:
The Board wrongly conceived the issue as being one of antedating the claim itself. Application of ss. 39(1), 41(1) and (5) discussed. Held that claimant did not show good cause for his delay in either providing the ROE or responding in some way to the letter by advising he did not yet have the ROE.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| claim procedure |
duration of disentitlement |
condition or requirement fulfilled |
|
Decision 21621
Full Text of Decision 21621
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| claim procedure |
record of employment |
submitted late |
|
Summary:
Claim filed 16-8-89 with 18 weeks. Required 20. A considerable time later (3-90), he discovered 2 other weeks. The Commission treated this as initial claim, ignoring his request to have earlier claim reconsidered. S.86 allows reconsideration. The issue was not dealt with.
