Decision 26065
Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Decision 26065 | Rouleau | English | 1994-11-24 |
Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
---|---|---|---|
Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
---|---|---|---|
claim procedure | record of employment | submitted late |
Summary:
Claim filed 4-89. Not enough weeks to qualify. Records of Employment submitted in 11-92 indicated he did have enough weeks. Reconsideration request considered as a late appeal. No special reasons warranting an extension of appeal period.