Decision T-1870.96
Full Text of Decision T-1870.96
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| federal court |
appeal system |
calculation of delay |
|
Summary:
Court decided that the request for a judicial review was late since it was not made within the 30 days set out in par. 18.1(2) of the Federal Court Act.
Decision A-1420.83
Full Text of Decision A-1420.83
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| federal court |
appeal system |
calculation of delay |
|
Summary:
The Umpire verbally indicated what his decision was to be. S.28 application filed within 10 days. Written decision given later. As a written decision is required under reg. 70(1), the application was not made in respect of a "decision".
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
document missing |
|
|
| board of referees |
right to be heard |
improper hearing |
|
| umpires |
judgment in written form |
a requirement |
|
Decision A-0548.83
Full Text of Decision A-0548.83
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| federal court |
appeal system |
calculation of delay |
|
Summary:
Decision of Umpire delivered orally on 11-4 and in writing on 30-6; appeal to FC on 21-4 premature since decision under appeal did not really exist before 30-6 under Reg. 70. However, appeal is still valid.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| umpires |
grounds of appeal |
natural justice and error in law or in fact |
|
| umpires |
judgment in written form |
a requirement |
|
