| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| federal court |
appeal system |
calculation of delay |
|
Summary:
Decision of Umpire delivered orally on 11-4 and in writing on 30-6; appeal to FC on 21-4 premature since decision under appeal did not really exist before 30-6 under Reg. 70. However, appeal is still valid.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| umpires |
grounds of appeal |
natural justice and error in law or in fact |
|
Summary:
It is clear that the Umpire substituted his opinoin for that of the board in respect of whether [there had been a change in duties] that could justify leaving voluntarily. He therefore exceeded the power conferred on him by s. 80.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| umpires |
judgment in written form |
a requirement |
|
Summary:
Decision of Umpire delivered orally on 11-4 and in writing on 30-6; appeal to FC on 21-4 premature since decision under appeal did not really exist before 30-6 under Reg. 70. However, appeal is still valid.
