| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
document missing |
|
|
Summary:
Letter of dismissal shown to but not handed to claimant. Copy refused to Commission pending law suit. Crucial character of letter undisputable. The Board proceeded knowing the evidence to exist and in spite of claimant's request to defer. Denial of natural justice.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| federal court |
appeal system |
calculation of delay |
|
Summary:
The Umpire verbally indicated what his decision was to be. S.28 application filed within 10 days. Written decision given later. As a written decision is required under reg. 70(1), the application was not made in respect of a "decision".
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
right to be heard |
improper hearing |
|
Summary:
Letter of dismissal shown to but not handed to claimant. Copy refused to Commission pending law suit. Crucial character of letter undisputable. The Board proceeded knowing the evidence to exist and in spite of claimant's request to defer. Denial of natural justice.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| umpires |
judgment in written form |
a requirement |
|
Summary:
The Umpire verbally indicated what his decision was to be. S.28 application filed within 10 days. Written decision given later. As a written decision is required under reg. 70(1), the application was not made in respect of a "decision".
