Decision 66921
Full Text of Decision 66921
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
conditions required |
reduction in hours |
|
Summary:
The claimant opted to remain a part-time employee at a greatly reduced salary rather than leave her employment and have to rely on EI benefits.
Decision 18593
Full Text of Decision 18593
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
conditions required |
reduction in hours |
|
Summary:
Farm worker reduced to part-time work, 3/4 of an hour a day feeding the animals. There was a 6-day period when he did not work or receive earnings and he returned to work on the 7th day.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
conditions required |
|
|
Decision 18206
Full Text of Decision 18206
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
conditions required |
reduction in hours |
|
Summary:
Weekly hours reduced from 24 to 8 1/2. She was given the choice of working either 3 days in every 3rd week or Fridays of every week. She opted for the latter. Last day worked: 13-5. First day of new schedule: 20-5. Validity of reg. 37(1) confirmed in HARTMANN.
By reading reg. 37(1), (2) and (2.1), it will be seen that a prescribed reduction in earnings can arise only in conjunction with illness, injury, quarantine, pregnancy or adoption. The Commisson has enacted no regulations for other circumstances. Reg. 37(1) then applies.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
charter |
|
|
Decision 17303
Full Text of Decision 17303
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
conditions required |
reduction in hours |
|
Summary:
Laid off from full-time job but continued working week-ends for the same employer. He did not have a prescribed reduction of earnings. Reg. 37(1) and 46(1) are not inconsistent. Reg. 46(1) deals with earnings in the waiting period and does not apply here.
Decision A-0516.88
Full Text of Decision A-0516.88
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
conditions required |
reduction in hours |
|
Summary:
Working hours reduced from 32 to 4 a week. 7-day requirement without work nor earnings not met. Ss. 37(1) is valid.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
charter |
|
|
| interruption of earnings |
conditions required |
|
|
| interruption of earnings |
layoff or separation |
definition |
|
Decision 13015
Full Text of Decision 13015
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
conditions required |
reduction in hours |
|
Summary:
GIGUERE referred to. For want of a regulation the reduction of work and earnings amendment to the Act is lost. The social purpose of the legislation is effectively defeated.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
conditions required |
rehired within 7 days |
|
| reconsideration of claim |
new facts |
with diligence |
|
| reconsideration of claim |
overpayment |
authority to write off |
|
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
interruption of earnings |
|
Decision 11875
Full Text of Decision 11875
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
conditions required |
reduction in hours |
|
Summary:
I agree with claimant that legalistic exactitude is causing considerable harship. I have been witness to the hardship caused. The intent of UI to provide temporary relief is defeated by reg. 37 and its narrow and short-sighted definition.
Decision A-0384.78
Full Text of Decision A-0384.78
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
conditions required |
reduction in hours |
|
Summary:
Hours of work reduced from full time to 2 hours per day; salary dropped from $125 to $25 per week. Not a reduction within the meaning of 2(1)(n), since no regulations had been made to cover this situation.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
charter |
|
|
| board of referees |
legislative authority |
absence of a regulation |
|
