Decision 11875
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 11875 | Rouleau | English | 1986-04-02 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| interruption of earnings | conditions required | reduction in hours |
Summary:
I agree with claimant that legalistic exactitude is causing considerable harship. I have been witness to the hardship caused. The intent of UI to provide temporary relief is defeated by reg. 37 and its narrow and short-sighted definition.