Summary of Issue: Decision Of Board

Decision 26819 Full Text of Decision 26819

Two issues were presented before the Board. Its reasons for decision are limited to the 2nd issue and the appeal is allowed. The Commission did not appeal to the Umpire. I find the decision of the Board was in favour of the claimant on both issues despite the fact that the decision was inadequate.

Decision A-1026.91 Full Text of Decision A-1026.91

Notice of appeal filed by CEIC on the last of the 21-day period. Held by the Umpire that the time limit had not been met since the notice was received by claimant 14 days later. Neither para. 87(2)(b) nor s. 53 contemplates the day of receipt of the notice as a relevant consideration. The Board's decision was rendered on 29-11-90. The UIC's notice of appeal was filed with the office of the Umpire on 20-12-90. That day was the last of the 21-day period, since the day the decision was rendered is not a day included in the calculation. Appeal brought within the 21-day time frame.

Decision 16728A Full Text of Decision 16728A

Appeal filed by the CEIC 22 days after the decision of the Board. As in CUB-4633A, it would not be appropriate to apply here Section 87 because this is not a case of benefits being paid after the decision of the Board, but rather the repayment of benefits received a long time before.

Decision 18709A Full Text of Decision 18709A

Refer to: A-1026.91

Decision A-0463.90 Full Text of Decision A-0463.90

The parties being at an impasse as to the meaning of the Board's decision, claimant requested a hearing from the Board to seek further clarification. The Board granted the request. The Board, even in the absence of specific statutory authority, had the jurisdiction to do what it did.

Decision 18045 Full Text of Decision 18045

Refer to: A-0463.90

Decision T-0621.87 Full Text of Decision T-0621.87

S. 87 applies until an Umpire decides the question, but not after. A favourable decision with respect to the issue under appeal, in this case whether monies were earnings, does not mean one is entitled to UI regardless of other entitlement conditions.

Decision 12079 Full Text of Decision 12079

Declared disentitled; delay in making continuous claims; insured successful at board which declared entitled; CEIC declared disentitled after fact because he was operating business; benefit to be paid under 87.

Decision T-2064.85 Full Text of Decision T-2064.85

Disqualified for voluntary leaving 6-5. Appeal filed 23-5. Amended notice showing misconduct sent 30-5. Board allows appeal regarding first notice and holds second notice as void. 3rd notice sent by CEIC showing misconduct. Writ of mandamus. Benefits to be paid under s. 87.

Decision T-0371.79 Full Text of Decision T-0371.79

8 insurable weeks according to the CEIC, 10 according to the Board of Referees; case allowed. Appeal by the CEIC after 21 days but before 60 days. CEIC claimed that the decision is void since it deals with insurability. Argument dismissed. The Board’s decision to be enforced.