| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
decision of board |
implementation |
|
Summary:
Refer to: A-1026.91
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
appeal system |
calculation of time for appeal |
|
Summary:
Refer to: A-1026.91
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| earnings |
wage-loss indemnity |
group plan |
|
Summary:
The CEIC contends that the Board's decision fails to comply with the requirements of ss. 79(2) inasmuch as it contained no findings of fact, especially with regard to the 6 conditions prescribed by para. 57(4)(a) to (f). Unfortunately, I am bound to agree. This was an error of law.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
errors in law |
statement of facts required |
|
Summary:
The CEIC contends that the Board's decision fails to comply with the requirements of ss. 79(2) inasmuch as it contained no findings of fact, especially with regard to the 6 conditions prescribed by para. 57(4)(a) to (f). Unfortunately, I am bound to agree. This was an error of law.
