Decision 45019
Full Text of Decision 45019
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
jurisdiction |
damages in tort |
|
Summary:
Claimant misinformed and BOR allowed $896 for emotional trauma. Misconception of the Regs and of its jurisdiction by the BOR. The Act does not confer upon the Commission, a BOR, an Umpire or even the Appellate Division of the FCA, jurisdiction to award damages or the equivalent thereof.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
errors in law |
excess of jurisdiction |
|
Decision 21911
Full Text of Decision 21911
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
jurisdiction |
damages in tort |
|
Summary:
The Board of Referees, an administrative tribunal, derives its powers solely from the Act and the Regulations.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
jurisdiction |
requiring or refusing a document |
|
Decision 18781
Full Text of Decision 18781
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
jurisdiction |
damages in tort |
|
Summary:
The Board exceeded its jurisdiction. There is no provision in the UI Act which empowers the Board to make awards of damages, costs or compensation, no matter how deserving the claimant. The remedy did not lie in an appeal to the Board.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| courses of instruction or training |
negligence by Commission |
|
|
