Decision 18924A
Full Text of Decision 18924A
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
issue not recognized |
second notice found valid |
|
Summary:
Benefit period from 23-3-86 to 21-3-87; notice of 15-4-87: pension income from 1-3-87; appeal on 22-9-87; notice of 30-10-87: pension income from 23-3-86 to 1-3-87. The second notice is not an amendment to the first, within the meaning of VON FINDENIG: periods and amounts differ.
Decision 20606
Full Text of Decision 20606
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
issue not recognized |
second notice found valid |
|
Summary:
Reference to ss. 44(1) replaced by 42(4) after claimant's appeal. HAMILTON and VON FINDENIGG referred to. I think it is illogical to hold against the CEIC what is a rather minor error, as it had no obligation to do so. Claimant had fully understood the content of the notice.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
issue not recognized |
decision maintained |
|
Decision 17819
Full Text of Decision 17819
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
issue not recognized |
second notice found valid |
|
Summary:
Notice of disqualification stating voluntary cessation of employment; lodged an appeal referring to misconduct; notice amended stating misconduct; new appeal. The Board relied on VON FINDENIGG in order not to rule on the 2nd notice. The principle at issue is not that of VON FINDENIGG; 2nd notice valid.
Decision 16859
Full Text of Decision 16859
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
issue not recognized |
second notice found valid |
|
Summary:
Claimant, following childbirth, is available at night. Notice dated 19-7 stated she had no babysitter. Appeal filed 16-8. Additional information obtained 17-8. Previous ruling rescinded and new one issued 24-8 stating undue restriction. Procedure acceptable as per CUB 11108.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
issue not recognized |
correction to consider |
|
| availability for work |
restrictions |
hours of work |
|
| availability for work |
job search |
warning before disentitlement |
|
Decision 13649
Full Text of Decision 13649
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
issue not recognized |
second notice found valid |
|
Summary:
Disentitlement terminated on 25-11-85. Notice correcting the date to 25-2-86 sent 5 days after receiving appeal. I am satisfied that there was an error as to the date, that s. 43 allows this type of correction to be made.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| sickness benefits |
proof |
|
|
Decision 11250
Full Text of Decision 11250
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
issue not recognized |
second notice found valid |
|
Summary:
Refer to: A-0780.85
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
weight of statements |
contradictory |
|
Decision A-0780.85
Full Text of Decision A-0780.85
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
issue not recognized |
second notice found valid |
|
Summary:
Notice of non-availability sent on 17-2. Appeal lodged 5 days after changing her initial statements. No change decision 6-3. Notice sent 19-3 replaces that of 17-2. Contrary to VON FINDENIGG, this was one and only notice, said the Umpire. No comment from FC.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
weight of statements |
contradictory |
|
