| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
weight of statements |
contradictory |
|
Summary:
According to the Umpire, it is a well-established principle that more weight must be given to the first statement than to a subsequent one where the first statement resulted in disentitlement to benefit. Upheld by FC without comment.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
issue not recognized |
second notice found valid |
|
Summary:
Notice of non-availability sent on 17-2. Appeal lodged 5 days after changing her initial statements. No change decision 6-3. Notice sent 19-3 replaces that of 17-2. Contrary to VON FINDENIGG, this was one and only notice, said the Umpire. No comment from FC.
