Decision 26819
Full Text of Decision 26819
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
decision of board |
implementation |
|
Summary:
Two issues were presented before the Board. Its reasons for decision are limited to the 2nd issue and the appeal is allowed. The Commission did not appeal to the Umpire. I find the decision of the Board was in favour of the claimant on both issues despite the fact that the decision was inadequate.
Decision A-1026.91
Full Text of Decision A-1026.91
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
decision of board |
implementation |
|
Summary:
Notice of appeal filed by CEIC on the last of the 21-day period. Held by the Umpire that the time limit had not been met since the notice was received by claimant 14 days later. Neither para. 87(2)(b) nor s. 53 contemplates the day of receipt of the notice as a relevant consideration.
The Board's decision was rendered on 29-11-90. The UIC's notice of appeal was filed with the office of the Umpire on 20-12-90. That day was the last of the 21-day period, since the day the decision was rendered is not a day included in the calculation. Appeal brought within the 21-day time frame.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
appeal system |
calculation of time for appeal |
|
Decision 16728A
Full Text of Decision 16728A
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
decision of board |
implementation |
|
Summary:
Appeal filed by the CEIC 22 days after the decision of the Board. As in CUB-4633A, it would not be appropriate to apply here Section 87 because this is not a case of benefits being paid after the decision of the Board, but rather the repayment of benefits received a long time before.
Decision 18709A
Full Text of Decision 18709A
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
decision of board |
implementation |
|
Summary:
Refer to: A-1026.91
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
appeal system |
calculation of time for appeal |
|
earnings |
wage-loss indemnity |
group plan |
|
board of referees |
errors in law |
statement of facts required |
|
Decision A-0463.90
Full Text of Decision A-0463.90
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
decision of board |
implementation |
|
Summary:
The parties being at an impasse as to the meaning of the Board's decision, claimant requested a hearing from the Board to seek further clarification. The Board granted the request. The Board, even in the absence of specific statutory authority, had the jurisdiction to do what it did.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
jurisdiction |
decision ambiguous |
|
board of referees |
jurisdiction |
decision incomplete |
|
Decision 18045
Full Text of Decision 18045
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
decision of board |
implementation |
|
Summary:
Refer to: A-0463.90
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
jurisdiction |
decision ambiguous |
|
board of referees |
jurisdiction |
decision incomplete |
|
Decision T-0621.87
Full Text of Decision T-0621.87
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
decision of board |
implementation |
|
Summary:
S. 87 applies until an Umpire decides the question, but not after.
A favourable decision with respect to the issue under appeal, in this case whether monies were earnings, does not mean one is entitled to UI regardless of other entitlement conditions.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
basic concepts |
types of claims |
|
|
Decision 12079
Full Text of Decision 12079
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
decision of board |
implementation |
|
Summary:
Declared disentitled; delay in making continuous claims; insured successful at board which declared entitled; CEIC declared disentitled after fact because he was operating business; benefit to be paid under 87.
Decision T-2064.85
Full Text of Decision T-2064.85
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
decision of board |
implementation |
|
Summary:
Disqualified for voluntary leaving 6-5. Appeal filed 23-5. Amended notice showing misconduct sent 30-5. Board allows appeal regarding first notice and holds second notice as void. 3rd notice sent by CEIC showing misconduct. Writ of mandamus. Benefits to be paid under s. 87.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
second notice a nullity |
|
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
decision not to reconsider |
|
Decision T-0371.79
Full Text of Decision T-0371.79
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
decision of board |
implementation |
|
Summary:
8 insurable weeks according to the CEIC, 10 according to the Board of Referees; case allowed. Appeal by the CEIC after 21 days but before 60 days. CEIC claimed that the decision is void since it deals with insurability. Argument dismissed. The Board’s decision to be enforced.