Summary of Issue: Pattern Study-Work Afterwards

Decision A-0177.94 Full Text of Decision A-0177.94

The case of CUB 17393A is authority for a finding that work obtained during the current school year does not establish a pattern of work during years prior to the disentitlement, while it may be a factor in future claims for benefits. Umpire's decision upheld by the FCA.

Decision 24103 Full Text of Decision 24103

Refer to: A-0177.94

Decision 25956 Full Text of Decision 25956

Since filing his claim for benefits, claimant worked 4 weeks while following a course. This period of employment is not considered significant enough to alter the disentitlement.

Decision A-1205.92 Full Text of Decision A-1205.92

Appeal allowed by the Board on the basis that the claimant worked as a dishwasher 16 hours on weekends; disallowed by the Umpire: spends 10 hours per day on his studies, no history of work/studies. Held that the Umpire did not act beyond his jurisdiction.

Decision 21385 Full Text of Decision 21385

Refer to: A-1205.92

Decision 23642 Full Text of Decision 23642

Resigned teaching to return to school. Course between 9:00 a.m. and 12:30 p.m. Disentitled from 2-9-92. Allowed by Board because claimant found part-time afternoon work (3-11/4-10 p.m.) effective 29-10-92. Jurisprudence examined. No exceptional circumstances. The Board erred in law.

Decision 21805 Full Text of Decision 21805

The Board restricted itself to considering a short period of approximately 2 months during which the beneficiary combined part-time work and full-time studies, this brief period of time being posterior to the application for benefits concerned. Error in law.

Decision 19055 Full Text of Decision 19055

A decision to be made with reference to a claimant's history of employment while attending a course of instruction must necessarily refer to past experience, and not to what might occur in the future. Future employment may have relevance to a future claim for benefit. The fact that the claimant did later find full-time employment while attending her course, some time after the hearing, does not have any relevance to the decision of the Board of Referees, and does not refute their reasoning.

Decision 17393A Full Text of Decision 17393A

Working part-time while taking a course. While it may be a significant factor in a future UI claim while enrolled in studies, not sufficient to establish a work pattern for present claim. No extended history of combining full-time studies and part-time work prior to this claim.

Decision 16242 Full Text of Decision 16242

Leaves his job in 12-86 to take courses. Favorable ruling by the Board starting 24-8-87, since the insured accepted 15 hours of work per week. Error in law. The required availability is full time during normal business hours. No work/study experience.

Decision 11945 Full Text of Decision 11945

The fact that he dropped 2 classes and did find part-time work starting in 2-85 does not affect the correctness of the decision taken by the Board on 11-12-84.