| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| penalties |
courses of study |
|
|
Summary:
The Board limits itself to a finding that since it has found claimant to be available she did not make false or misleading statements. This ignores her negative answers to the question of whether she attended a course during the period in the reporting cards. Umpire's decision upheld by the FCA.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
courses |
pattern study-work afterwards |
|
Summary:
The case of CUB 17393A is authority for a finding that work obtained during the current school year does not establish a pattern of work during years prior to the disentitlement, while it may be a factor in future claims for benefits. Umpire's decision upheld by the FCA.
