Decision A-0666.99
Full Text of Decision A-0666.99
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
partial working week |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant admitted wanting to establish his law office and not look for other employment. According to the Umpire, section 30 of the EIA creates a presumption that, in the situations listed therein, a claimant is considered to have worked a full working week and it is the claimant's responsibility to disprove this presumption, which he failed to do. FCA summarily dismissed the claimant's application.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
charter |
|
|
Decision 16659
Full Text of Decision 16659
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
partial working week |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant disentitled from 17-2-87 to 31-8-87. Appeal dismissed with one variation. The provisions in play here are those for whole weeks rather than single days and accordingly the disentitlement should be from 22-2-87 to 29-8-87.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
earnings |
|
|
Decision 15291
Full Text of Decision 15291
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
partial working week |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant disentitled as not available 4 days because he was licensed to sell real estate. CEIC submits this is just mere technicality since he was employed in real estate. I do not agree. That ground was chosen to disentitle him. Having a license does not mean non-availability.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
real estate salespersons |
|
|
Decision 13908
Full Text of Decision 13908
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
partial working week |
|
|
Summary:
According to s. 10, unemployment must be determined by the week and not by the day. Disentitlement must start not on Wednesday but on following Sunday. However, availability not proved as of Wednesday.
Decision 11323
Full Text of Decision 11323
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
partial working week |
|
|
Summary:
Board ruled claimant unemployed for a period commencing on a Thursday and ending on a Wednesday. The Act specified period as weeks of unemployment and so Commission ruled claimant not available for days worked in partial weeks. Whether this is correct need not be decided here.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
natural justice |
notice of hearing |
|
Decision 11260
Full Text of Decision 11260
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
partial working week |
|
|
Summary:
Held as not unemployed from 11-4 to 24-6-83. Since the 4 days during which claimant babysat from 27-6 to 30-6 were not considered a full working week, the claimant was disentitled on the basis of non-availability.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
babysitting |
|
|
Decision 10918
Full Text of Decision 10918
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
partial working week |
|
|
Summary:
I limit duration of non-availability under 25(a) to a number of days less than one week. Accordingly, decision under Reg. 43 justifies disentitlement for full weeks only, while decisions under 25(a) may be for any additional day.
