Decision 19982
Full Text of Decision 19982
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
control of working hours |
|
|
Summary:
University research fellow who worked 2 weeks full time mistakingly believing he would eventually be paid. Not being self-employed, the Board wrongly referred to 43(1)(b) rather than Reg. 44 stating he set his own hours.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
work without earnings |
|
|
Decision 17033
Full Text of Decision 17033
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
control of working hours |
|
|
Summary:
Reg. 43(1)(b) is premised on the existence of a definite employer-employee relationship, as opposed to self-employment or business on one's own account, or at least being nominally associated with potential employer. Here, claimant was elected to position of Chief of Band.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
elected representatives |
|
|
availability for work |
job search |
incomplete information |
|
availability for work |
job search |
number of contacts |
|
earnings |
income |
elected or appointed representative |
|
Decision 14781
Full Text of Decision 14781
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
control of working hours |
|
|
Summary:
The insured claims that the board committed an error in law by using the criteria under Reg. 43(1)(b) to maintain ineligibility according to Reg. 44. There is no reason to uphold this claim. Employed by her spouse and genuinely holding down a job.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
full working week |
|
|
Decision 13174
Full Text of Decision 13174
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
control of working hours |
|
|
Summary:
Employment to which reg. 43(1)(b) relates is one where a definite employer-employee relationship exists, as opposed to being self-employed or engaged in business on one's own account under reg. 43(1)(a). [p. 3]
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
real estate salespersons |
|
|
Decision 12915
Full Text of Decision 12915
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
control of working hours |
|
|
Summary:
Although from time to time had specific appointments with clients, made by his employer, the insured, as an accountant, was still not an employee who had to work from 9:00 to 5:00, for example. [p. 7]
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
availability for work |
|
|
week of unemployment |
professional field |
|
|
Decision 12897
Full Text of Decision 12897
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
control of working hours |
|
|
Summary:
If the Commission relies on reg. 43(1)(b) it must prove employment, i.e. an arrangement of a contractual nature. Contract of service means services provided for remuneration. Helping out family is not employment.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
contract of services |
|
|
board of referees |
weight of statements |
from third party |
|
Decision 12898
Full Text of Decision 12898
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
control of working hours |
|
|
Summary:
The fact it was more expedient for claimant to work [as taxi driver] at some hours or days rather than others does not mean he did not control hours. He had discretion as to whether to work or not.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
minor in extent |
|
|
Decision 11185
Full Text of Decision 11185
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
control of working hours |
|
|
Summary:
Car salesman who cannot attend at dealership at times other than those open to customers, also subject to alternate lunch hours. The Board found claimant controlled his working hours. There was sufficient evidence to reach such conclusion.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
full working week |
|
|
week of unemployment |
commission salespersons |
|
|
week of unemployment |
principal means of livelihood |
|
|
Decision 10336
Full Text of Decision 10336
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
control of working hours |
|
|
Summary:
While a commission salesman was required to schedule appointments with potential customers at their convenience, he remained in control of his hours. Not directed to report to specified location at specified time. In control of scheduling of his appointments.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
commission salespersons |
|
|
Decision 68745
Full Text of Decision 68745
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
control of working hours |
Maternity Benefits |
|
Summary:
While the claimant was on maternity leave, she was not free to be gainfully employed in operating a business.