| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
control of working hours |
|
|
Summary:
The insured claims that the board committed an error in law by using the criteria under Reg. 43(1)(b) to maintain ineligibility according to Reg. 44. There is no reason to uphold this claim. Employed by her spouse and genuinely holding down a job.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
full working week |
|
|
Summary:
Since she was the only employee, she claims that she cannot be compared to the same rank or class according to Reg. 44(1). Precedent has clearly established that the comparison can be done with persons of the same rank employed elsewhere.
