Decision 18413
Full Text of Decision 18413
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
refusal of work |
questions to examine |
|
|
Summary:
When the issue of refusal to accept suitable employment arises, the Board should consider 4 questions: 1) was there a refusal; 2) was the employment offered suitable; 3) was there good cause for the refusal; 4) what disqualification period is appropriate.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
refusal of work |
good cause |
|
|
refusal of work |
duration of employment |
|
|
refusal of work |
union hiring hall |
|
|
refusal of work |
suitability |
defined |
|
Decision 17555
Full Text of Decision 17555
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
refusal of work |
questions to examine |
|
|
Summary:
Board clearly states claimant had valid reason for refusal. I don't understand why a person was excluded for 2 weeks. If reason was valid under 27(1)(a), she should not have been excluded.
Decision 10113
Full Text of Decision 10113
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
refusal of work |
questions to examine |
|
|
Summary:
(1) if there has been a refusal; (2) if the employment was suitable; (3) if the insured had good cause; (4) assessment of disqualification not exceeding 6 weeks.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
refusal of work |
wages or salary |
|
|
Decision A-0800.80
Full Text of Decision A-0800.80
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
refusal of work |
questions to examine |
|
|
Summary:
The CEIC says there is no evidence that conditions of work were less favourable under 40(3). Claimant simply says she wants full-time work and part-time will not cover her expenses. Thus, it is not necessary to decide this issue since unsuitability of employment is neither asserted nor established.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
refusal of work |
good cause |
|
|