Decision 17555
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 17555 | Teitelbaum | French | 1990-01-08 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allowed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| refusal of work | questions to examine |
Summary:
Board clearly states claimant had valid reason for refusal. I don't understand why a person was excluded for 2 weeks. If reason was valid under 27(1)(a), she should not have been excluded.