Decision 14924
Full Text of Decision 14924
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| job creation |
disqualification and disentitlement |
|
|
Summary:
Insured person declared ineligible until 22-7. Therefore, before that date, he could not serve the 6-week disqualification resulting from employment refusal. Therefore, ineligible even if employed within a job creation project. [p. 5]
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
disqualification and disentitlement |
|
|
Decision 13912
Full Text of Decision 13912
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| job creation |
disqualification and disentitlement |
|
|
Summary:
Agricultural worker declared not to be unemployed as of 7-4. Nonetheless continued on job creation project for 2 weeks. No pay owing for those 2 weeks.
Decision 11840
Full Text of Decision 11840
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| job creation |
disqualification and disentitlement |
|
|
Summary:
Benefits not payable after 15 weeks. Disentitled due to pregnancy under s.46. The fact that claimant was engaged in a job creation project does not alter the situation. As she was not otherwise entitled, neither can she be eligible for an extension of her benefit period.
Decision 11723
Full Text of Decision 11723
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| job creation |
disqualification and disentitlement |
|
|
Summary:
Job Creation Projects are work projects sponsored by employers whereby participants receive UI instead of wages. It is clear from reading s.25 that claimants must be eligible to otherwise receive benefits under the Act in order to be eligible for Job Creation benefits.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| job creation |
remuneration to be repaid as overpayment |
|
|
| reconsideration of claim |
errors by Commission |
not a ground of entitlement |
|
