Decision 22832
Full Text of Decision 22832
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
working conditions |
dress and appearance |
|
Summary:
Cook and waitress in a restaurant. A public health inspector ordered her to wear a hairnet when carrying out these duties. She complied with the order to wear a hairnet in the kitchen but categorically refused to wear it to serve customers, which is also required by the employer.
Decision 16704
Full Text of Decision 16704
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
working conditions |
dress and appearance |
|
Summary:
Salesclerk dressed in a way that contributed to harassment by customers and left instead of accepting appropriate changes in dressing. The 2-week disqualification was upheld. No other work in sight.
Decision 14106
Full Text of Decision 14106
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
working conditions |
dress and appearance |
|
Summary:
The Board says 'fired' and states a prudent person would not jeopardize his employment by anything so trifling as to wear a necktie and concludes to misconduct. Was told to either put on a tie or leave which he did. Appeal dismissed. Disqualification reduced to 3 weeks.
Decision 12612
Full Text of Decision 12612
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
working conditions |
dress and appearance |
|
Summary:
Employed with Eaton. Left rather than wear a jacket. The Board did not err in finding that the maximum disqualification of 6 weeks was warranted.
