| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
special reasons |
discretion of Commission |
time for appeal to bor |
Summary:
Claimant's evidence was that she did not become fully aware that there was a viable right of appeal until she was advised by Jobs Ontario that she should have been receiving UI benefits. The BOR refused to allow her an extension of time to appeal but Umpire set the BOR's decision aside stating that it contained no finding of facts to support it. The Commission seeked judicial review of the Umpire's decision to the FCA but claimant simply consented to the Court's judgment.
