Decision 30424
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 30424 | Reed | English | 1995-11-06 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allowed | Yes | Claimant | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| board of referees | special reasons | discretion of Commission | time for appeal to bor |
Summary:
It would be inconsistent with the Bill of Rights to interpret subsection 79(1) as allowing the Commission to control the procedure for the appeal of its decisions. Such an interpretation leads to a fundamental unfairness.