| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| teaching |
contract renewed |
|
|
Summary:
Relying on the FCA decision in Partridge (A-0704.97), the Court came to the conclusion that the claimant's payments of hold-back pay during the summer months meant that he still had a contract of employment during those months. The Court also distinguished the case of Ying (A-0101.98) on the basis that in Ying, there was no summer hold-back pay and that there was a break of time and legal continuity between the original teaching contract and the renewal contract. It also found that the claimant was still employed as evidenced by the hold-back pay paid during the summer months.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| teaching |
leave terminating with end of school year |
|
|
Summary:
Relying on the FCA decision in Partridge (A-0704.97), the Court came to the conclusion that the claimant's payments of hold-back pay during the summer months meant that he still had a contract of employment during those months. The Court also distinguished the case of Ying (A-0101.98) on the basis that in Ying, there was no summer hold-back pay and that there was a break of time and legal continuity between the original teaching contract and the renewal contract. It also found that the claimant was still employed as evidenced by the hold-back pay paid during the summer months.
