| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| teaching |
contract renewed |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant was given a new contract in June before the expiry of the current one with an effective date in the following September. Commission determined that there had not been a termination in contract. Distinguishing the case from the FCA decision in Ying (A-0101.98), Umpire held that claimant must be considered as being bound by an employment and that he was under this status during the months of July and August, notwithstanding the fact that the "effective dates" might only be in September.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| teaching |
contract terminating with end of school year |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant was given a new contract in June before the expiry of the current one with an effective date in the following September. Commission determined that there had not been a termination in contract. Distinguishing the case from the FCA decision in Ying (A-0101.98), Umpire held that claimant must be considered as being bound by an employment and that he was under this status during the months of July and August, notwithstanding the fact that the "effective dates" might only be in September.
