Decision 25519
Full Text of Decision 25519
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
courses |
interruption |
short period of time |
Summary:
Full-time student applying for benefits over the Christmas break from 11-12 to 4-1. The limitation placed on his availability for work was such as to make any job search redundant. The short period of availability in a restricted work market cannot be seriously considered as qualifying him for UI.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
jurisdiction |
binding judgments |
|
Decision 22697
Full Text of Decision 22697
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
courses |
interruption |
short period of time |
Summary:
School break from 16-4 to 4-5. The Board agreed that finding work for such a short period restricted the availability sufficiently to justify a conclusion that claimant was not available. While it is a borderline case, the decision is not so manifestly erroneous as to justify me to interfere.
Decision 12849
Full Text of Decision 12849
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
courses |
interruption |
short period of time |
Summary:
UI not meant to subsidize full-time educational pursuits. Although the period from 24-11 to 5-1 is a rather long Christmas vacation, the Board declined to allow the appeal. Decision unexceptionable.
Decision 12091
Full Text of Decision 12091
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
courses |
interruption |
short period of time |
Summary:
8 week course interrupted by 3 weeks of inactivity; issue related to these 3 weeks.
Decision 11602
Full Text of Decision 11602
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
courses |
interruption |
short period of time |
Summary:
Although forcefully argued by claimant that a Christmas labour market of some 3 weeks does in fact exist, the overwhelming jurisprudence is quite clear. A student in full-time attendance at school is not considered to be on the labour market.
Decision 11353
Full Text of Decision 11353
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
courses |
interruption |
short period of time |
Summary:
Availability as required by s.25 is generally availability for regular full-time employment. Claimant's restrictions for the duration of the Christmas holiday period and to an occupation in which there were few opportunities are clearly restrictions which show non-availability.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
courses |
pattern study-work as requirement |
|
| reconsideration of claim |
errors by Commission |
not binding for future |
|
Decision 11307
Full Text of Decision 11307
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
courses |
interruption |
short period of time |
Summary:
Factual case. Attending courses, semester ends 16-12 and says he would not be returning to school until 16-1. No evidence of job search. Case allowed from 3-1: advised on that date his marks were not adequate to continue the course.
Decision 11040
Full Text of Decision 11040
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
courses |
interruption |
short period of time |
Summary:
Student available full-time during Christmas holidays. According to CUB-2987, except in exceptional cases, restriction disqualifies. Nothing to show this was an exceptional case. No history of working during holidays.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
legislative authority |
purpose of ui system |
|
| availability for work |
courses |
presumption |
|
