Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
availability for work |
courses |
pattern study-work as requirement |
|
Summary:
Some exceptions to the requirement that availability is for full-time employment where a claimant has established a past pattern of part-time employment (insurance premiums will have been paid on the basis of that part-time employment). In such cases, limited time to be allowed.
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
reconsideration of claim |
errors by Commission |
not binding for future |
|
Summary:
Claimant's irritation arises out of the fact that he had been granted benefits the previous year. The misapplication of the Act previously is not a legal ground which entitles an Umpire to upset a Board's decision.
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
availability for work |
courses |
interruption |
short period of time |
Summary:
Availability as required by s.25 is generally availability for regular full-time employment. Claimant's restrictions for the duration of the Christmas holiday period and to an occupation in which there were few opportunities are clearly restrictions which show non-availability.