Decision 69538
Full Text of Decision 69538
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
Parental benefits |
|
Summary:
In error, the claimant received 33 weeks of parental benefits and his wife had been paid 21 weeks of parental benefits for the care of the same child.
Decision 17730
Full Text of Decision 17730
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
adoption benefits |
|
Summary:
Adoption benefits claimed 7-2. Case allowed based on court order making adoption legal 15-1 without enquiring as to date of child placement. Found later that placement had occurred in previous October and overpayment resulted. GRANGER quoted.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| parental benefits |
actually placed |
|
|
Decision 42471
Full Text of Decision 42471
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
earnings |
|
Summary:
BOR allowed appeal based on an error made on the Notice of Decision which did not spelled out all the separation moneys the total represented. Clmt is not relieved from the operation of the allocation provisions even if the Commission provides erroneous information or commits an error.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
material fact |
mistake as to a |
new facts to BOR, Umpire or Commission |
Decision 14547
Full Text of Decision 14547
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
earnings |
|
Summary:
Even though the facts show claimant was honest and acted in good faith, earnings have to be allocated as provided for in the Regulations and if he received an overpayment it is proper for the Commission to claim a refund.
Decision 13915
Full Text of Decision 13915
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
earnings |
|
Summary:
Wages in lieu of notice for 10 weeks received on lay-off from Flyer Industries not earnings. Monies later ruled insurable, and then became earnings. Overpayment: $2284. Strong recommendation for write-off.
Decision 14255
Full Text of Decision 14255
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
insurability |
|
Summary:
Employment ruled not insurable by NR/T and 2 benefit periods voided. Overpayment: $4620. Appealed NR/T's ruling but outcome unknown. Verification necessary. If the employment is not insurable, then the Commission's decision is correct as claimant would not have sufficient weeks to qualify.
Decision 11732
Full Text of Decision 11732
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
insurability |
|
Summary:
Benefit period established in 1982. Employment ruled not insurable by NR/T in 1984. Benefit period void. Overpayment: $9,000 written off by the Commission. It is not disputed that claimant was ineligible. I am unable to find anything which would allow me to reverse the Board's decision.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
overpayment |
authority to write off |
|
Decision 11461
Full Text of Decision 11461
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
insurability |
|
Summary:
In view of the decision of the Tax Court that the employment was not insurable, it is clear that claimant did not have sufficient weeks to qualify for benefits. Overpayment of $5377.
Decision 24471
Full Text of Decision 24471
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
interruption of earnings |
|
Summary:
Some 3 months after termination, following a complaint filed by the union, a severance pay was paid to claimants. A reallocation of earnings was made from date of termination, including vacation and statutory holiday pay. S. 43 used to cancel the benefit period and start it from a later date.
Decision 16854
Full Text of Decision 16854
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
interruption of earnings |
|
Summary:
A pastor who ceased to be paid his monthly salary of $1446 because of a lack of funds but continued to be provided with housing accommodations estimated at $75 weekly. Retroactive ruling resulting in substantial overpayment.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
conditions required |
non-monetary income |
|
| earnings |
income |
in kind |
|
Decision 14030
Full Text of Decision 14030
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
interruption of earnings |
|
Summary:
Laid off full-time but continued 2 days a week. Reported earnings without fail. Overpayment: $4000 due entirely to Commission's oversight in allowing claim all these years.
Decision 13015
Full Text of Decision 13015
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
interruption of earnings |
|
Summary:
Rehired part-time 4 days after lay-off and reported his earnings without fail for the following 8 months. No interruption of earnings. Overpayment: $7150.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
conditions required |
rehired within 7 days |
|
| interruption of earnings |
conditions required |
reduction in hours |
|
| reconsideration of claim |
new facts |
with diligence |
|
| reconsideration of claim |
overpayment |
authority to write off |
|
Decision 12440
Full Text of Decision 12440
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
interruption of earnings |
|
Summary:
No interruption of earnings. Overpayment in the amount of $4620 brought about by misinformation given by the Commission and also by not investigating until long after payments had expired.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
conditions required |
rehired within 7 days |
|
| reconsideration of claim |
overpayment |
hardship defined |
|
Decision 12356
Full Text of Decision 12356
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
interruption of earnings |
|
Summary:
8 months involved. Last day worked 5-12, re-employed 12-12. The result is anomalous. Because he had an interruption of earnings of only 6 days he was not initially entitled to claim for benefits. [p. 2-3]
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
conditions required |
rehired within 7 days |
|
| earnings |
bonus |
retaining one's services |
|
| board of referees |
jurisdiction |
priority of law |
|
| reconsideration of claim |
errors by Commission |
not a ground of entitlement |
|
Decision 11002
Full Text of Decision 11002
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
interruption of earnings |
|
Summary:
Claimant laid off 31-12-82 but returned to same employer on part-time basis within 7 days and worked every week in 1983 reporting to the Commission all earnings received. Retroactive ruling.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
charter |
|
|
Decision 74123
Full Text of Decision 74123
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
interruption of earnings |
reinstatement |
Summary:
EI benefits were paid to the claimant from January 16 to November 26, 2005. The Commission learned that, on May 30, 2006, a memorandum of understanding was reached between the claimant and the employer. The claimant was reinstate in his position with pay from December 16, 2004 to March 16, 2006, to settle the claimant's grievance. The Commission determined that there was no interruption of earnings as the claimant was not unemployed for seven consecutive days. That decision resulted in an overpayment. The claimant's appeal is dismissed by the Umpire.
Decision 64248
Full Text of Decision 64248
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
rate of benefit |
|
Summary:
The Commission made a number of errors and, as a result, had to change the benefit rate more than once. Despite the open and candid statements of the claimant, who must repay significant sums though he has committed no error, the Court may not contravene the Act and regulations which require that claimants repay unowed sums they have received.
Decision 41322
Full Text of Decision 41322
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
rate of benefit |
|
Summary:
The initial benefit rate was wrongly calculated by the Commission. As a result of new information the rate was corrected. Umpire concluded that, while one can understand the annoyance of claimant, unfortunately it is the law which must be applied and in faling to do this, the BOR made in error in law. The error was detected and corrected by the Commission well within the time limit allowed by the legislation.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
errors by Commission |
not a ground of entitlement |
|
| board of referees |
errors in law |
misinterpretation of provision |
|
Decision 20087
Full Text of Decision 20087
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
rate of benefit |
|
Summary:
Insurable remuneration of $11,300 introduced into computer instead of $5,651 so weekly payments of $339 instead of $170; overpayment of $4,199. Section 13 not open to interpretation. Section 43 authorizes correction notwithstanding Section 86 (no new facts).
Decision 17008
Full Text of Decision 17008
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
rate of benefit |
|
Summary:
Rate recalculated and reduced from $127 to $115 upon receipt of an additional Record of Employment.
Decision 16273
Full Text of Decision 16273
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
rate of benefit |
|
Summary:
The insured received worker's compensation benefits plus certain amounts that made out the difference between his regular salary and the benefits. Only the amounts were insurable, so that the rate of benefit was reduced retroactively. Refer to BLONDIN.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
rate of benefit |
computation |
|
Decision 15637
Full Text of Decision 15637
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
rate of benefit |
|
Summary:
Termination of employment 7-10-83, UI application 11-10, benefit period began 2-10. Occupied new job for 16 weeks; subsequent rate based on 16 weeks (that of 2-10 went unnoticed). Error corrected on 2-86: over payment of $700. Beginning of benefit period ajusted to 9-10-83.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
benefit periods |
commencement date |
|
Decision 15312
Full Text of Decision 15312
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
rate of benefit |
|
Summary:
One Record of Employment not submitted at time of filing. Rate adjusted retroactively from $275 to $215. The fact that the overpayment came about because claimant acted on incorrect advice of Commission staff, if in fact he did, is irrelevant. He received benefits to which he was not entitled.
Decision 15011
Full Text of Decision 15011
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
rate of benefit |
|
Summary:
Claimed to have acted on the advice of CEIC in declaring only the last 10 weeks of employment so as to benefit from a higher rate. If there was in fact an error on the part of CEIC, such an error does not make the decision law. Section 43 makes it possible to go back 36 months.
Decision 13944
Full Text of Decision 13944
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
rate of benefit |
|
Summary:
The Commission erred in calculating the rate now reduced from $229 to $153 resulting in overpayment of $2128. It is clear that the Commission has the right to reconsider the claim. S.43 and 35 are crystal clear if action taken within 3 years. It is irrelevant that the error came from the Commission.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
overpayment |
authority to write off |
|
Decision 13478
Full Text of Decision 13478
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
rate of benefit |
|
Summary:
Handwriting error: rate of $89 reduced to $59 and $1,110 overpayment. Write-off of overpayment recommended.
Decision 13223
Full Text of Decision 13223
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
rate of benefit |
|
Summary:
Rate of benefit erroneously based on 12 instead of 20 insured weeks. The Commission freely admits that it made the error which resulted in overpayment and relies on s.43. The words of the Act are abundantly clear and have to be applied.
Decision 13193
Full Text of Decision 13193
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
rate of benefit |
|
Summary:
Last employment declared insurable several months after claim; adjusted rate of benefit reduced from $228 to $178; $775 overpayment.
Decision 12702
Full Text of Decision 12702
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
rate of benefit |
|
Summary:
Claim reconsidered after 14 months under s.43. Employer's failure to abide by reg. 35 and provide a Record of Employment at the proper time is of no help to claimant under s.15 of the Charter.
Decision 12682
Full Text of Decision 12682
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
rate of benefit |
|
Summary:
A second Record of Employment discovered nearly 2 years later. Rate substantially reduced on 2 distinct benefit periods. Commission's authority found in s.86 and ss.43(1).
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
overpayment |
authority to write off |
|
Decision 12619
Full Text of Decision 12619
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
rate of benefit |
|
Summary:
Weekly rate reduced from $180 to $103 more than one year following termination of the benefit period. Overpayment: $2662. Clerical error by CEIC.
Decision 12605
Full Text of Decision 12605
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
rate of benefit |
|
Summary:
The Commission delayed for 8 months the recalculation following receipt of Record of Employment. Rate reduced from $253 to $111. Overpayment: $5814. Ss.43(1) allows 36 months as a delay. The Commission is technically correct but I would strongly recommend the writing-off of the overpayment.
Decision 12564
Full Text of Decision 12564
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
rate of benefit |
|
Summary:
Error by CEIC; rate calculated on earnings of $3,416 instead of $2,416; $1,538 overpayment; 1 year in issue; s. 43 provides for 36 months; overpayment repayable under 35 and 36. If there is injustice, only Parliament can eliminate it.
Decision 12548
Full Text of Decision 12548
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
rate of benefit |
|
Summary:
Payroll records examined 9 months after benefit period terminated. Rate reduced from $189 to $185. The Commission relied exclusively on Revenue Canada figures. It made no independent investigation as to their accuracy. ATWAL referred to. Error in law.
Decision 12443
Full Text of Decision 12443
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
rate of benefit |
|
Summary:
CEIC made calculation error. Rate of $255 reduced to $107. $2,400 overpayment. Amendments suggested concerning discretion and possible write-off of overpayments.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
overpayment |
authority to write off |
|
| reconsideration of claim |
overpayment |
hardship defined |
|
Decision A-0223.79
Full Text of Decision A-0223.79
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
rate of unemployment |
|
Summary:
Four weeks of overpayment because the CEIC miscalculated the unemployment rate and failed to terminate the benefit period at the correct time. Validity of former Reg. 166(2) (current Reg. 52) confirmed.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
rate of unemployment |
|
|
Decision 13083
Full Text of Decision 13083
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
record of employment erroneous |
|
Summary:
Incorrect record of employment went unnoticed and error in calculation; s. 43 permits error to be corrected.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
authority to review |
new facts vs reconsideration |
|
| reconsideration of claim |
errors by Commission |
not a ground of entitlement |
|
Decision 12099
Full Text of Decision 12099
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
record of employment erroneous |
|
Summary:
Long delay by CEIC in acting; rate of benefit and number of weeks corrected; $441 overpayment.
Decision 11940
Full Text of Decision 11940
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
record of employment erroneous |
|
Summary:
Benefit paid at rate of $107 per week. One year later discovered that record of employment in error. Wrong number of insurable weeks under Reg. 13. Rate reduced to $83. $950 overpayment.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
hearings |
by telephone |
|
| board of referees |
natural justice |
defined |
|
| basic concepts |
insurability |
minimum insurable |
|
Decision 11526
Full Text of Decision 11526
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
record of employment erroneous |
|
Summary:
Rate of benefit, commencement and duration of benefit period adjusted retroactively. As per CUB_5664: The Commission has the power, not to say the duty, to correct retroactively any administrative error. I too share this view.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
authority to review |
time limitation |
|
Decision 14873
Full Text of Decision 14873
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
retroactive disqualification |
|
Summary:
According to the dissenting member of the board, no new facts to warrant reexamination pursuant to sect. 86. Without passing judgment on the merits of this assertion, CEIC could do so pursuant to section 43(1) at any time in the 36 months following the payment of benefits.
Decision 13329
Full Text of Decision 13329
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
retroactive disqualification |
|
Summary:
Employment reported in March. On 4-7, the Commission investigates the reason for separation. Disqualified 20-8. Overpayment: $828. Taking into consideration the full disclosure, the fact that he found alternative employment soon after, the retroactivity, penalty reduced from 3 to 2 weeks.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
legislation |
rationale |
|
Decision 13312
Full Text of Decision 13312
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
retroactive disqualification |
|
Summary:
Disqualification reduced from 6 weeks to 2 merely because it had retroactive effect, since CEIC had delayed acting.
Decision 12945
Full Text of Decision 12945
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
retroactive disqualification |
|
Summary:
Voluntarily left in 7-84 and 3-week disqualification imposed in 3-85 retroactive to 7-84. As for the write-off of the overpayment, it is a matter for the Commission, not within the jurisdiction of the Umpire.
Decision 12777
Full Text of Decision 12777
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
retroactive disqualification |
|
Summary:
Left approved course 6-5. Benefits paid to middle of May. Disqualification for leaving course backdated to 6-5. Claimant objected to overpayment. No doubt that the law was applied properly. Disqualification starts from the date claimant dropped out of the course.
Decision 12734
Full Text of Decision 12734
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
retroactive disqualification |
|
Summary:
Worked in January. This information came to the Commission's attention in March or April. Disqualification resulted in overpayment. Retroactive aspect not at issue.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
relations at work |
unhappy atmosphere |
|
Decision 11410
Full Text of Decision 11410
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
retroactive disqualification |
|
Summary:
Loss of part-time employment through misconduct. Disqualification reduced to 3 weeks due to part-time and then to 2 weeks due to extenuating circumstances.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
absences from work |
|
|
| reconsideration of claim |
overpayment |
time limitation for recovery |
|
| basic concepts |
disqualification |
length |
|
Decision 11073
Full Text of Decision 11073
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
retroactive disqualification |
|
Summary:
Claimant failed to give reason for leaving work in space provided on report card. Disqualified 21 months after the event. Rather surprising that Commission seeks repayment. However claimant partly at fault. Disqualification reduced to one week.
Decision 13558
Full Text of Decision 13558
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
sickness benefits |
|
Summary:
Insured received retroactive payments from the CSST. According to appellant, the Act must not have retroactive effect. This argument cannot be accepted. Subs. 17(3), like many other provisions of the Act, may have retroactive effect.
Decision 13038
Full Text of Decision 13038
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
weeks of unemployment |
|
Summary:
Full-time real estate agent earned no income, said he was told by CEIC that he was entitled to benefit; situation covered by ss. 43(1) and 35.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
real estate salespersons |
|
|
| reconsideration of claim |
errors by Commission |
not a ground of entitlement |
|
Decision 16992
Full Text of Decision 16992
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
factual cases |
workers' compensation payments |
|
Summary:
Appeal made to Workers' Compensation Appeal Board and claimant paid compensation effective 1 year earlier. The Commission has an obligation to seek recovery of UI under 35(1) and 36 and claimant has an obligation to repay.
