Decision 22398
Full Text of Decision 22398
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| penalties |
warning letter |
|
|
Summary:
Even though no penalty has been imposed, in a letter of 12-89, the claimant is formally accused of having knowingly provided inaccurate information and told that a note to that effect will be appended to his file. CEIC itself deems this letter to be a decision that confers right of appeal. The Board must decide.
Decision 19579
Full Text of Decision 19579
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| penalties |
warning letter |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant advised by CEIC that, while a s.33 offence exists, no penalty is imposed but her records will reflect this for the future. Held that a s.33 offence does not exist and the Commission's records are to reflect this by the removal of any reference to such an offence.
Decision 15336
Full Text of Decision 15336
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| penalties |
warning letter |
|
|
Summary:
This is a CEIC decision even if it is in the form of a warning. The Board should have ruled on this subject. The fact that no penalty was imposed does not nullify the decision regarding false statements. The burden of proof is on CEIC.
