Summary Search Results...


Decision 39001 Full Text of Decision 39001

Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
penalties rationale
Summary:

Umpire stated that if claimants wish to collect unemployment insurance and take part in business enterprises at the same time, it is easy for them to check with an agent of the Commission before applying for benefits. They do get caught in the long run. Penalties are imposed to castigate such conduct and to attempt to dissuade others from similar actions.


Decision A-0600.94 Full Text of Decision A-0600.94

Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
penalties rationale
Summary:

Ss.33(1) is clearly a penalty provision permitting the Commission to impose a financial sanction, in addition to requiring the claimant to repay the money incorrectly received. However, it does not create a criminal offence.

Other Issue(s): Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
penalties knowingly
penalties business
penalties work without remuneration
penalties clear and simple language
penalties proof
penalties proof need for an explanation weight

Decision 25451 Full Text of Decision 25451

Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
penalties rationale
Summary:

Refer to: A-0600.94

Other Issue(s): Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
penalties business
penalties work without remuneration
penalties knowingly
penalties clear and simple language
penalties proof
penalties proof need for an explanation weight

Decision 16121 Full Text of Decision 16121

Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
penalties rationale
Summary:

The penalty evinces a 2-fold purpose and function. It constitutes a rebuke and denunciation of a claimant who plays fast or loose with UI system and a deterrent to others; and, secondly, a small way to compensate CEIC and public for expenses of handlingthe claims.


Decision 14551 Full Text of Decision 14551

Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
penalties rationale
Summary:

Claimant has confused s.47 with a prosecution under another section. S.47 is not a prosecution by Commission against the accused where the accused would have to appear, or would have the right to appear, to defend the charges made against him.

Other Issue(s): Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
board of referees jurisdiction reason for existence of boards

Decision 13298 Full Text of Decision 13298

Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
penalties rationale
Summary:

It is a disposition which at the same time assures the continuing integrity of an UI scheme when its administration must so often rely on voluntary disclosure by individual claimants.

Other Issue(s): Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
penalties clear and simple language
penalties amount of penalty
penalties proof need for an explanation

Decision 12997 Full Text of Decision 12997

Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
penalties rationale
Summary:

If law, fairness and equity are to be preserved, the Act calls upon nothing else but complete candor and utter honesty whenever info by a claimant is made to the Commission.

Other Issue(s): Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
voluntarily leaving employment relations at work foul language

Decision 12220 Full Text of Decision 12220

Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
penalties rationale
Summary:

Penalty provisions are there to keep people honest. The Commission must substantially rely on the good faith and honesty of claimants when they fill out their report cards which the Commission cannot constantly and continually monitor. [p. 8]

Other Issue(s): Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
board of referees hearings by telephone
penalties proof need for an explanation
Date modified: