Decision 67118
Full Text of Decision 67118
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| penalties |
Group collusion |
|
|
Summary:
This case as well as several others (CUBs 67089-67092 and 67105-67118) involve an employer, Béton Projeté M. A. H. Inc., and several benefit periods from 2000 to 2003 which were cancelled creating overpayments by reason of the claimants not having an interruption of earnings. Three of the claimants held each 25% of the company shares - the other two were foreman and secretary/accountant. The company operated in reduced fashion in the winter. The claimants continued to work and to receive a salary and numerous benefits. Therefore, there was no interruption of earnings within the meaning of section 14(1) of the Employment Insurance Regulations.
