Decision 63624
Full Text of Decision 63624
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| compassionate care |
requirements |
|
|
Summary:
The Umpire stated that the claimant would not qualify for compassionate care benefits because the evidence does not satisfy the requirements of s. 23.1(2)(a) of the Act. He concluded that it was an error in law for the Board to direct the Commission to pay compassionate care benefits in place of regular benefits because she was caring for her disabled father.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
incompatible situations |
family obligations |
|
