Decision A-0281.95
Full Text of Decision A-0281.95
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
farming |
full working week |
|
Summary:
Alleged that contrary to Reg.42(2), no evidence submitted that claimant worked 5 days/week. Held that BOR was entitled to accept evidence as being probative of the fact that, by doing 60-70 hours each week, she had worked at least a 5-day week without the specific statement being made. Upheld by FCA
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
right of being represented |
|
|
| proof |
errors in law |
burden of proof |
|
| board of referees |
errors in law |
burden of proof |
|
| proof |
errors in law |
rules of evidence |
|
| board of referees |
right to be heard |
language to be used |
|
Decision 25973A
Full Text of Decision 25973A
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
farming |
full working week |
|
Summary:
Refer to: A-0281.95
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
right of being represented |
|
|
| proof |
errors in law |
burden of proof |
|
| board of referees |
errors in law |
burden of proof |
|
| proof |
errors in law |
rules of evidence |
|
| board of referees |
right to be heard |
language to be used |
|
Decision 20266
Full Text of Decision 20266
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
farming |
full working week |
|
Summary:
Left full-time employment in order to obtain an agricultural loan of $40,000 stating that farming was his main occupation. Subsequently employed as school bus driver and makes a claim for UI benefits at the end of June.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| earnings |
farming |
definition |
|
Decision 15700
Full Text of Decision 15700
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
farming |
full working week |
|
Summary:
Regulation 43(3) stipulating that a self-employed worker employed in agriculture is unemployed from 1-10 to 31-3 does not apply to the insured who was employed by a farmer, since she cannot be considered a self-employed worker.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
conditions required |
non-monetary income |
|
| earnings |
income |
in kind |
|
Decision 13942
Full Text of Decision 13942
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
farming |
full working week |
|
Summary:
Function of Reg. 42(2) is to define working week of an agricultural worker, not unit of measurement for a self-employed worker, which is the role of Reg. 43.
Decision 13835
Full Text of Decision 13835
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
farming |
full working week |
|
Summary:
Reg. 43(2) does not apply to a farm worker. Only 43(3) may exempt him from 43(1) and that applies only to the off season.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
partnership and co-adventure |
|
|
Decision 12341
Full Text of Decision 12341
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
farming |
full working week |
|
Summary:
Self-employed farmer deemed to be working for purposes of Reg. 42(2).
Decision 11634
Full Text of Decision 11634
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
farming |
full working week |
|
Summary:
Reg. 43(3) applies for benefit of claimant who is employed in farming and who cannot benefit from more general exception in 43(2).
