Decision 24072
Full Text of Decision 24072
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| umpires |
right of appeal |
late forwarding of docket |
|
Summary:
The Commission's failure to file the appeal docket and its statement of observations within 60 days is not cause for dismissing its appeal (see GIROUX A.). However, I am not prepared to allow any material filed outside the 60-day time period to form part of the record.
Decision A-0086.79
Full Text of Decision A-0086.79
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| umpires |
right of appeal |
late forwarding of docket |
|
Summary:
According to Umpire, the appeal by the CEIC is void because it did not comply with the 60 days allowed under Reg. 68(3) for filing the docket. Judgment reversed: lateness in filing the docket cannot affect the outcome of the appeal.
Decision A-0117.79
Full Text of Decision A-0117.79
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| umpires |
right of appeal |
late forwarding of docket |
|
Summary:
The Umpire decided not to hear the Commission as it did not file the appeal docket within 60 days as required by reg. 68(3). The Court ruled that a new hearing is to be held during which the same rights shall be recognized to both parties.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| sickness benefits |
sickness defined |
|
|
| basic concepts |
qualifying period |
extension |
illness |
Decision A-0087.79
Full Text of Decision A-0087.79
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| umpires |
right of appeal |
late forwarding of docket |
|
Summary:
According to Umpire, the appeal by the CEIC is void because it did not comply with the 60 days allowed under Reg. 68(3) for filing the docket. Judgment reversed: lateness in filing the docket cannot affect the outcome of the appeal.
Decision A-0691.78
Full Text of Decision A-0691.78
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| umpires |
right of appeal |
late forwarding of docket |
|
Summary:
According to Umpire, the appeal by the CEIC is void because it did not comply with the 60 days allowed under Reg. 68(3) for filing the docket. Judgment reversed: lateness in filing the docket cannot affect the outcome of the appeal.
Decision A-0690.78
Full Text of Decision A-0690.78
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| umpires |
right of appeal |
late forwarding of docket |
|
Summary:
Appeal by CEIC cannot be deemed to be void simply because it did not comply with 60 day period allowed by Reg. 184(3), now 68(3), for filing the docket.
Decision A-0689.78
Full Text of Decision A-0689.78
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| umpires |
right of appeal |
late forwarding of docket |
|
Summary:
The Umpire refused to hear the CEIC because it had not complied with the 60 day time allowed under Reg. 68(3) for filing the appeal docket. Judgment wrong in law. Although judge has charge of the proceedings, must apply the same rules to both parties.
