| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
commuting |
transportation difficulties |
|
Summary:
The FCA decided that the SST and the BOR applied the proper test to determine if the claimant had other reasonable alternative than to leave her employment because she had no way to get to work for the night schedule, her car was seized in error by the city of Montreal. Before the FCA, the claimant relied on new evidence. Generally, the FCA examines the validity of the decision subjected to judicial review on the basis of the evidence which were before the administrative decision-maker. The application for judicial review was rejected. The FCA's decision can be found in French only at this address: http://decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/fr/item/108382/index.do
