| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| penalties |
record of employment |
|
|
Summary:
The Commission determined that the claimant had filed a false Record of Employment. This resulted in the cancellation of the claim, an overpayment, a penalty and a violation. The FCA ruled that the evidence which was before the BOR and the Umpire supported the factual finding that the claimant was never employed by the Owner of the ROE. The critical finding of fact was reasonable.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
overpayment |
|
|
Summary:
The Commission determined that the claimant had filed a false Record of Employment. This resulted in the cancellation of the claim, an overpayment, a penalty and a violation. The FCA ruled that the evidence which was before the BOR and the Umpire supported the factual finding that the claimant was never employed by the Owner of the ROE. The critical finding of fact was reasonable.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| penalties |
violation |
|
|
Summary:
The Commission determined that the claimant had filed a false Record of Employment. This resulted in the cancellation of the claim, an overpayment, a penalty and a violation. The FCA ruled that the evidence which was before the BOR and the Umpire supported the factual finding that the claimant was never employed by the Owner of the ROE. The critical finding of fact was reasonable.
