| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
conditions required for disentitlement |
|
|
Summary:
Before considering whether any of the relieving conditions of s.44(1) have been met, it is necessary to determine whether the conditions precedent to the imposition of the disentitlement were met.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
loss of employment |
dual employment |
|
Summary:
Lost his main employment due to the strike 15-9-78 but his part-time job continued until lack of work 30-12-78 and was no sham. Both were insurable. Employment defined in 2(1)(g). He had 2 employments. The loss of one is not the loss of "his". He continued to be employed.
