| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
restrictions |
geographical area |
after moving |
Summary:
Many months after leaving his job for health reasons, claimant moved from Edmonton to 100 Mile House where he had a relative. Comparison between the labour markets had to be made with respect to claimant's situation. This was not done here. The policy was applied blindly.
The fact that Edmonton was obviously a much larger labour centre than the 100 Mile House area was no compelling proof that the claimant's chances of re-employment were, in his particular circumstances, significantly reduced.
