Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
work without earnings |
|
|
Summary:
[According to the Umpire, claimant was unemployed even though he worked the full week at his brother's new gas station: he did it in the evening without any pay in the hope of creating a job for himself.] Decision of board not vitiated by any of the errors in 95.
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
umpires |
grounds of appeal |
natural justice and error in law or in fact |
|
Summary:
According to the Umpire, claimant was unemployed even though he worked the full week at his brother's new gas station, which he did in the evening without any pay in the hope of creating a job for himself. Judgment reversed, decision of board was not vitiated by any of the errors in s. 80.