| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
benevolent work |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant who devoted much time to his wife's 2 businesses operated out of the basement of their family home. For assistance or voluntary effort to be authentic, the applicant would not be able to derive any economic benefit. No evidence to this effect.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
business of a spouse |
|
|
Summary:
For assistance or voluntary effort to be authentic, the applicant would not be able to derive any economic benefit. The Board made a finding unfavourable to the claimant regarding the number of hours he devoted to his wife's business. No error of law.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
proof |
|
|
Summary:
We do not know whether he used the time available to him after his voluntary departure in such a way as to make do with the situation that could be economically advantageous to him or whether he was merely filling up his free time. Question of fact; onus on him under s. 40.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
charter |
|
|
Summary:
The 2 parties agree that para. 43(1)(b) adopted under para. 44(c) and (d) applies. Minority judgment: the definition of week of unemployment is found in ss. 10(1), the delegation for the adoption of the specifications in para. 44(d) and the specifications in s. 42, 43 and 44.
